From Smart Cities to Cities of Happiness: Bridging Data and Well-Being

Cities around the world are undergoing a digital transformation in pursuit of efficiency and sustainability. The Smart City model leverages data, technology, and innovation to improve urban management – making everyday life easier and better for residents. But beyond smart infrastructure and high-tech dashboards lies a deeper goal: ensuring citizens are truly happy and healthy in their communities.

This article explores how smart cities can evolve into “Cities of Happiness” by integrating well-being, community engagement, mental health, sustainability, and inclusivity into their development. We will look at Pinecrest (a village in Miami) as a pioneering example with its 2024 Cities of Happiness report, and consider how global smart city networks – including insights from the Smart Cities event in Curitiba, Brazil – can incorporate happiness indicators into their planning. In doing so, we suggest ways city leaders, technologists, and citizens can collaborate to balance technology-driven innovation with human-centered goals, using co-creation and bottom-up engagement to build smarter and happier cities.

Smart Cities and the Pursuit of Better Urban Living

A “smart city” is commonly defined by its use of advanced technology and data-driven tools to optimize urban services and improve quality of life. Sensors and IoT devices monitor everything from traffic flow and energy usage to air quality and waste collection, feeding real-time data into city dashboards. City officials can then make informed decisions – for example, adjusting traffic signals to reduce congestion or deploying resources more efficiently during emergencies. The focus of smart cities has traditionally been on efficiency, sustainability, and safety. By automating systems and analyzing big data, they aim to conserve resources, reduce carbon footprints, and deliver public services more effectively. In essence, a smart city is “more connected, efficient, sustainable, and inclusive” with the overarching goal of enhancing residents’ quality of life.

However, technology alone does not guarantee happiness. A city could have free Wi-Fi, smart lighting, and AI traffic control, yet still struggle with social isolation or citizen dissatisfaction. Recognizing this, modern smart city thinking is beginning to shift from a purely tech-centric approach to a people-centric one. In global forums like the Smart City Expo, leaders emphasize that urban innovation must ultimately improve people’s lives. For instance, the 2025 Smart City Expo in Curitiba frames its mission as helping cities become “more inclusive, connected and resilient” and inviting everyone to “transform cities and build happiness with us!”. In other words, the smart city agenda is evolving to encompass not just smart infrastructure but also smart well-being – blending digital solutions with strategies to enhance community happiness.

From Smart City to “City of Happiness”

What exactly is a City of Happiness? It’s a city that measures its success not only by economic growth or service delivery, but by the genuine well-being of its people. The World Happiness Foundation’s Cities of Happiness Initiative (CHI) provides a framework for this, using a “Wheel of Happiness and Well-Being” with nine key dimensions of life: physical & mental health, spiritual well-being, communal (community bonds), civil (civic engagement and governance), financial stability, cultural vibrancy, ecological sustainability, social relationships, and intellectual growth. The Village of Pinecrest in Miami-Dade County has emerged as a trailblazer in applying this framework. As the first U.S. municipality to implement CHI, Pinecrest “adopt[ed] the Wheel of Happiness and Well-Being as its guiding framework,” aligning city priorities and resources with what truly matters to residents – quality of life, mental health, and community connectedness. This initiative reframes municipal governance through the lens of happiness and well-being, ensuring that data and innovation serve human needs.

Crucially, evolving into a City of Happiness doesn’t mean abandoning technology – it means broadening the smart city vision. A happiness-focused city still uses data analytics and sensors, but it tracks additional metrics like residents’ life satisfaction, stress levels, or sense of community, alongside traditional indicators. It uses innovative tools (surveys, mobile apps, even wearables) to gather feedback on well-being and pairs these with qualitative community input. In Pinecrest’s case, the city’s happiness initiative was both visionary and pragmatic, blending extensive research with community feedback to understand what drives (or detracts from) residents’ happiness. By overlaying well-being goals onto the smart city model, cities can transition from being simply modern and efficient to being truly livable and fulfilling. In short, the path from Smart City to City of Happiness is about integrating the heart into the hardware of urban development.

Pinecrest’s “Wheel of Happiness” in Action

Pinecrest, Florida offers a practical example of how a smart city can put happiness at the core of its strategy. In 2024, Pinecrest conducted a comprehensive well-being assessment as part of its Happy Pinecrest People Initiative (HaPPI) and Cities of Happiness report. The process was highly data-driven and inclusive: the town facilitated 30 focus groups with diverse residents (from students to seniors) and ran digital surveys to collect both quantitative and qualitative insights. This extensive community engagement underscored a key principle – that residents’ voices should guide change. Through these efforts, Pinecrest identified several key drivers of happiness for their community, including: safety and security, access to green spaces and nature, strong community engagement, robust mental health resources, and quality education opportunities. Each of these drivers maps to one or more dimensions of the “Wheel of Happiness.” For example, safety relates to the communal and civil dimensions, green spaces to the ecological dimension, mental health to physical & mental, community engagement to social and communal, and education to intellectual growth.

What did Pinecrest learn? The findings revealed a blend of strengths and areas for improvement. On one hand, overall happiness levels were high – about 73.5% of residents reported being happy or very happy. Social ties were a strong point as well: 90% of residents felt emotionally close to family or friends, reflecting tight-knit social bonds. On the other hand, there were clear gaps. Only 52% of residents were satisfied with Pinecrest’s mental health initiatives, showing a need for more support and stigma reduction around mental well-being. Similarly, while the community highly values education, many noted that local schools needed more mental health resources and reduced academic pressure on students. Environmental happiness came through loud and clear – 92% of respondents cherished access to parks and green spaces, making ecological stewardship a top priority. Yet, residents also suggested improvements like better recycling programs and more tree planting to enhance sustainability.

Pinecrest’s report essentially created a happiness dashboard for the city, spanning all nine dimensions of the Wheel. For each dimension, the village gathered specific community feedback and metrics. A few examples: in the Spiritual domain, most residents said gratitude and faith practices contributed to their happiness (though a quarter did not engage in such practices). In the Financial domain, a majority were content with their personal finances, yet many seniors wanted tax relief and cost-of-living support. In the Communal/Social domain, people felt Pinecrest had a friendly, safe atmosphere, but newer residents and bigger lot sizes sometimes limited neighborly interactions – many called for more community events and volunteer opportunities to “reconnect” the community. Under Civil (civic life), around 70% trusted the integrity of local officials, but residents still desired greater government transparency and communication. These insights illustrate how a city can quantify and understand happiness in concrete terms. Just as a smart city might have a traffic congestion index or crime rate stats, Pinecrest now has baseline measures of subjective well-being and community sentiment.

Importantly, Pinecrest didn’t stop at measuring – it moved to action. Based on the findings, the village developed recommendations and initiatives targeting each happiness dimension. For instance, to bolster mental health, Pinecrest proposed campaigns to remove stigma and expand counseling (including a 24/7 support hotline), partnerships with schools for “Be-Well” programs, and even an “Adopt a Senior” program to combat loneliness among the elderly. To strengthen the social/communal bonds, they suggested “Neighborhood Circles” – small resident groups to foster local connections – and more intergenerational community events. In the environmental realm, initiatives include community tree-planting days, invasive species removal drives, and integrating green infrastructure in planning. To support education (intellectual), the plan calls for teacher wellness programs and rethinking school schedules to reduce student stress. Even civic engagement got attention: Pinecrest aims to increase law enforcement visibility and host community safety forums to build trust and transparency. Many of these solutions blend high-tech and human touch – for example, using a gamified survey platform to engage citizens in feedback, or potentially employing an app for residents to report wellness concerns or request community activities.

Through these steps, Pinecrest is demonstrating how a smart city can pivot to a happiness-centric governance model. As one summary noted, Pinecrest “align[ed] budgets and policies with the Wheel of Happiness” so that every decision is evaluated for its impact on well-being. The city is using data-driven planning (real-time survey data to guide decisions), focusing on eradicating loneliness (creating programs and spaces to bring people together), and building integrated systems that connect mental health, education, and environment efforts for holistic outcomes. The result is a new kind of city blueprint – one that other cities can learn from.

Bringing Happiness Metrics to Global Smart Cities

The success of Pinecrest’s approach has implications far beyond one community. As cities worldwide share knowledge through networks like the Smart Cities Expo and related events, the Pinecrest model offers a replicable template for blending technology with well-being. Imagine a typical smart city command center: large screens show traffic speeds, energy usage, and public safety alerts. Now imagine if alongside those, there were Happiness Indicators – live updates from citizen happiness surveys, metrics on community participation rates, mental health service usage, or even a “mood index” aggregated from optional smartphone check-ins. Some pioneering cities have already started this. In Dubai, for example, the government launched a real-time “Happiness Meter”, which was one of the city’s first smart city initiatives. It’s a city-wide, live sentiment capture system – effectively an ongoing digital poll where residents can signal their satisfaction at various service touchpoints – feeding into a centralized happiness dashboard. Dubai’s Happiness Meter provides officials with up-to-the-minute data on how happy people are with services, allowing quick response if satisfaction dips. This kind of tool shows how a smart city can explicitly measure happiness as a key performance indicator, just as it would measure transit efficiency or crime rates.

Beyond individual tools, global events and coalitions are pushing the agenda. At the Smart City Expo in Curitiba, Brazil, one of the prominent themes has become “Cities for People & Well-Being.” This reflects a growing consensus that smart cities must be about people as much as about tech. The organizers note that at the Expo, “urban planning connects with well-being” and stakeholders come together to prioritize safety, inclusion, and quality of life for all. In fact, the upcoming Smart City Expo Curitiba 2025 explicitly embraces the slogan “transforming cities, building happiness”, emphasizing that transforming a city is about more than physical changes – it’s about improving lives and happiness of citizens. City leaders from around the world attending such conferences are increasingly interested in happiness indices and well-being dashboards. Many municipalities already conduct citizen satisfaction surveys; the next step is uniting these efforts with smart city data platforms.

To use the Pinecrest model, smart cities can start by adding happiness metrics to their dashboards and strategic plans. For instance, a city could adopt the nine “Wheel of Happiness” dimensions as categories in its master plan, ensuring each dimension has targets and projects associated with it. Technology can assist in tracking these: health apps and clinics provide data on physical and mental health trends, environmental sensors and park usage stats inform ecological satisfaction, digital platforms gather citizen feedback on cultural and social offerings. At planning meetings, city officials might review not only the usual budget and infrastructure updates, but also a Happiness Report that aggregates these well-being indicators. Pinecrest’s experience shows that even subjective data (like how connected or safe people feel) can be systematically collected and acted upon. A network of cities sharing such data could accelerate learning – much like crime data or traffic data are shared today, cities could compare happiness benchmarks and learn which policies move the needle on community well-being.

Moreover, adding happiness indicators is a way to humanize data-driven governance. It reminds city staff and technologists that behind every data point is a person’s lived experience. For example, a reduction in average commute time (a typical smart city metric) is not just a number – it might correspond to residents feeling less stressed and having more time with family (happiness outcomes). Conversely, a high-tech solution that saves money but causes frustration (like a confusing digital service kiosk) might show up immediately in the happiness dashboard as a dip in user satisfaction. Thus, happiness metrics serve as a vital feedback loop, keeping smart city efforts accountable to the public’s actual well-being. Cities connected through smart city networks can even set collective goals, such as all member cities striving to improve their happiness index by a certain amount, sharing best practices on reaching those goals.

Collaboration: Balancing Tech Innovation with Human-Centered Goals

Transitioning to a City of Happiness model requires breaking silos – it’s a collaborative effort among city leaders, technologists, and community stakeholders. Here are ways these groups can work together to balance tech-driven innovation with human-centered outcomes:

• Leadership & Vision: City leaders (mayors, councilors, administrators) need to explicitly prioritize well-being in their vision and policies. This might mean creating a Chief Well-Being and Happiness Officer role or interdepartmental task force on quality of life, much like Pinecrest’s mayor did by declaring a commitment to govern “with happiness at the core”
• Data & Technology Teams: Technologists and urban planners can develop the tools to measure and enhance happiness. This includes building happiness dashboards that compile data from surveys and sensors, and developing mobile apps or online platforms for ongoing citizen feedback. For instance, a city app could regularly ask users short well-being questions (“How was your day in the city?”) to crowdsource sentiment. Data scientists can analyze social media (ethically and with privacy in mind) to gauge community sentiment trends. Smart city tech can also target well-being outcomes directly: consider IoT benches and streetlights that also collect environmental comfort data, or AI chatbots that help citizens navigate mental health resources. However, tech teams must work closely with sociologists, public health experts, and community organizations to interpret the data in human terms. An algorithm might flag a neighborhood with low happiness responses; it then takes human insight to find out if that’s due to, say, a lack of community events or a recent local incident. In this way, the quantitative data is paired with qualitative understanding for effective solutions.
• Community Stakeholders: Residents, community groups, and businesses are not just beneficiaries of smart-happiness initiatives – they should be co-creators. Pinecrest’s approach exemplified this by involving hundreds of residents in workshops and focus groups to design solutions

A core principle in both smart cities and happy cities is co-creation. Rather than top-down implementations, the most successful projects are those designed with people, not just for them. This means iterative design: prototype a new civic app with input from actual users; pilot a community gardening program with resident volunteers and adjust based on their feedback. When citizens see their input tangibly shaping projects, it “fosters a sense of ownership and pride” in the community. This stronger civic engagement creates a virtuous cycle – engaged citizens are happier, and happy citizens are more likely to engage positively with city initiatives. In sum, collaboration ensures that high-tech innovations are grounded in real human needs and that human-centered projects are amplified by tech, achieving the best of both worlds.

Shared Metrics and Synergies Between Smart & Happy Cities

At first glance, data-driven governance and qualitative happiness goals might seem like different worlds. But in practice, they are deeply interconnected. Many of the outcomes a smart city seeks overlap with what a happy city seeks – they just use different language. Let’s highlight some shared metrics and synergies:

• Quality of Life Improvements: This is the ultimate goal of both approaches. A smart city might quantify quality of life through metrics like commute times, healthcare access, or crime rates. A happy city might look at self-reported life satisfaction or mental health prevalence. In reality, these inform each other. For instance, if smart transit data shows shorter commutes and less congestion, one would expect stress to decrease and satisfaction to rise. Conversely, if happiness surveys show residents are anxious or unhappy, it might prompt an investigation into possible causes (e.g., unreliable public transport or unaffordable housing) that smart data can help pinpoint. Integrated dashboards can correlate the hard data with the soft data to give a full picture. Cities like Singapore and Barcelona (often cited as leading smart cities) have started to incorporate livability indices that include green space per capita, recreation opportunities, and health outcomes, which bridge into well-being territory.
• Health and Wellness: Smart cities heavily invest in health tech (telemedicine, health sensors, fitness programs) and environmental health (air quality, water quality tracking). These directly feed the Physical & Mental and Ecological dimensions of happiness. If air pollution sensors show improvement after a policy change, that data is not just an environmental win – it’s a happiness win, as residents’ physical well-being and comfort improve. Similarly, a city might use data on park usage (from smart park gates or mobile phone location data) as a proxy for physical activity levels in the community. By monitoring these, a city can set targets like “increase park usage by 20%” and tie it to happiness goals of better health. Mental health is trickier to quantify, but smart cities can include metrics like number of mental health consultations, usage of wellness apps, or even social media sentiment analysis to detect community mood. These give early warnings and success measures for initiatives aimed at improving mental well-being.
• Social Connectivity and Loneliness: This is an area where qualitative and quantitative meet. A happy city will track how connected people feel (as Pinecrest did, finding many want more neighbor interaction). A smart city can complement this by analyzing participation in community programs, attendance at events (through event apps or ticket data), and even communication patterns (for instance, are certain neighborhoods less connected to city communications platforms?). In the UK and some other countries, governments have even begun measuring loneliness as a statistic. Smart city data like library visits, sports league memberships, or use of community Wi-Fi can indirectly indicate social engagement levels. By combining these with survey responses on loneliness, cities can identify hotspots of social isolation and respond with targeted community-building efforts (meetups, community centers, etc.). Addressing loneliness is a clear example where a city must be “smart” (using data to locate and understand the issue) and “happy” (implementing compassionate interventions). Pinecrest made combatting loneliness a priority, proposing an “Adopt a Senior” program and more intergenerational events, which aligns tech (organized programs, communication platforms) with humanity
• Civic Participation and Trust: Smart governance often touts transparent, open data and e-participation tools (like participatory budgeting platforms or 311 service request apps). These produce metrics such as number of citizens voting on budget proposals, or response times to citizen complaints. The happiness framework looks at whether people feel heard by their government and trust public institutions. These go hand in hand – if a city’s open data portal shows that 80% of citizen suggestions were acted on, one can expect trust and perceived integrity of government to be high. Conversely, if surveys show people feel disconnected from local government, usage stats of civic apps might be low. By linking them, a city can set goals to increase both the usage of engagement tools and the satisfaction of citizens with government responsiveness. In Pinecrest, despite a generally positive view of governance, many residents wanted greater transparency and better communication of information
• Economic and Financial Well-Being: Smart cities measure economic indicators like employment rates, cost of living, and business growth. The happiness angle asks: do people feel financially secure and optimistic? For example, a smart city might know that median income is rising, but a happiness survey might reveal that certain groups still feel financially stressed. Merging these data, leaders can create targeted programs (such as financial literacy workshops or affordable housing projects) and then monitor outcomes through both economic data and happiness feedback. The “financial” dimension in Pinecrest’s Wheel of Happiness highlighted that while most were satisfied, some seniors struggled with property taxes

Finally, a major synergy lies in Sustainability and Resilience. A city that is environmentally sustainable and prepared for shocks (natural or economic) creates a stable foundation for people to be happy long-term. Smart cities bring tools like climate data modeling, energy grids, and disaster alert systems; happy cities bring community resilience, volunteer networks, and a culture of mutual support. Together, they ensure that progress is not just high-tech but also sustainable for future generations. As noted in Pinecrest’s model, integrating environmental, social, and mental health strategies leads to stronger overall resilience. A city that reduces its carbon footprint (smart) also gives its residents cleaner air and pride in their green lifestyle (happy). A city that uses predictive analytics for disaster response (smart) also reduces anxiety and trauma for citizens (happy). Each reinforces the other.

In summary, data-driven governance and happiness governance are complementary. When a city overlays the happiness lens on its data, numbers turn into meaningful narratives about people’s lives. Conversely, when it grounds its happiness goals in data, lofty ideals gain practical traction. This fusion produces tangible benefits: healthier, empowered citizens; more responsive and trusted institutions; and sustainable urban environments that nurture well-being. It is exactly what Pinecrest achieved and what global smart city leaders are increasingly striving for.

Smart and Happy

As we move further into the 21st century, the ultimate measure of a city’s success will not be just how smart it is, but how happy its people are. The journey from smart cities to Cities of Happiness represents a transformative shift in urban development – one that retains the advantages of technology and data while refocusing on human well-being. Pinecrest’s experience shows that this is both feasible and fruitful: by systematically listening to residents and addressing the full spectrum of their needs (physical, social, environmental, spiritual, and beyond), a city can boost not only its happiness index but also its effectiveness and resilience as a community. And it need not sacrifice innovation to do so; in fact, innovation becomes more meaningful when guided by what residents truly value.

City leaders, technologists, and citizens each have a role to play in this evolution. Leaders must champion policies that value happiness as much as GDP, setting bold examples like creating happiness budgets or departments. Technologists must design smart solutions that don’t just dazzle with gadgetry, but demonstrably improve day-to-day life and mental well-being. Citizens must stay engaged, voicing their aspirations and co-creating their city’s future. When these players collaborate in a spirit of co-creation, cities become living labs of happiness – agile in trying new ideas, open in sharing data and results, and inclusive in ensuring everyone’s voice counts. The result is a new governance paradigm where freedom, connection, and happiness define the essence of community.

Events like the Smart Cities Expo in Curitiba and networks of innovative cities worldwide are already helping spread this message. They are proving that the smartest cities are those that put people first. A city with fast internet, self-driving buses, and AI-powered utilities is impressive; but a city where technology also helps neighbors form closer bonds, reduces stress, gives people purpose, and uplifts the vulnerable – that is truly future-ready. By embedding happiness indicators into urban dashboards and treating well-being as a key performance metric, cities ensure that progress is not hollow. Each data point on a chart corresponds to a smile, a sigh of relief, a moment of connection, a life changed for the better.

In conclusion, the convergence of smart city innovations with happiness frameworks is a powerful synergy. It offers a path for cities to be not only more efficient and sustainable, but also more compassionate and joyful. As Pinecrest leads the way and others follow, we can envision a world where cityscapes are filled with smart technology and the sounds of community laughter – where high-rises and high well-being rise together. The call is clear: let’s build cities that are both smart enough to know what is needed, and wise enough to know what truly matters. The City of Happiness is no longer a utopian ideal; it’s the next chapter of the smart city story, and it’s already unfolding one happy community at a time.

Join our community of Global Well-Being and Impact Leaders:

Apply here: Global Well-Being and Impact Leadership Certification – Application Page

Join us in this bold journey. Let’s champion a new paradigm of leadership together – one where happiness, well-being, and impact are at the heart of every strategy and every action.

Become a part of GWILC and help realize the vision of a world where everyone, everywhere can thrive in freedom, consciousness, and happiness. The next seven years of global leadership evolution start now – and we invite you to lead the way.

#LeadWithWellBeing #GWILC #Happytalism #GlobalLeadership #WorldHappiness

Jaipur Rugs Jaipur Rugs Foundation Upasana Design Studio World Happiness Fest – bēCREATION World Happiness Academy University for Peace (UPEACE) – UN Mandated UPEACE Centre for Executive Education Saamdu Chetri Manas Kumar Mandal

Dr. Rekhi Singh REKHI FOUNDATION FOR HAPPINESS Adamas University Shoolini University Saamdu Chetri Vibha Tara Manas Kumar Mandal Prof. (Dr.) Shauli Mukherjee

Visit www.worldhappinessfest.com and become part of the journey. Together, we regenerate. Together, we create magic.

What’s your perspective?

Join us today and become a conscious catalyst for well-being. Together, we can create a world where happiness leads the way.

Join this global movement and elevate your organization!

REGISTRATIONS OPEN

Access the link for English: https://lnkd.in/d8cinrFU

Spanish: https://lnkd.in/dtwuRaTT

Portuguese: https://lnkd.in/dFRNYBQZ

#Psychobiology #Hypnotherapy #MindBodyConnection #Neuroscience #SubconsciousMind #HealingThroughHypnosis #MentalHealthAwareness #Epigenetics #BruceLipton #CandacePert #EllenLanger #MindfulBody #MatthewBrownstein #InterpersonalHypnotherapy #DavidSpiegel #PlaceboEffect #MindOverMatter #Neuroplasticity #HolisticHealing #StressReduction #CognitiveBehavioralTherapy #PsychosomaticHealing #HealingTrauma #EmotionalWellbeing #ChronicPainRelief #AnxietyManagement #MeditationAndHypnosis #SelfTransformation #UnlockingTheHiddenLight #ResilienceAndHealing

….join the Cities of Happiness Initiative: https://www.teohlab.com/city-of-happiness

Unlocking the Hidden Light book: https://a.co/d/gaYuQJ6

Join the pull of Mental Health Professionals ready to help addressing trauma and nurturing collective well-being: https://forms.gle/39bGqU177yWcyhSUA

Join the community of catalysts of positive transformation: https://www.worldhappiness.academy/bundles/certified-chief-well-being-officer-professional-coach

Enjoy a free 30-minute coaching session with me. Book it here: https://www.worldhappiness.academy/courses/coaching-and-hypnotherapy-with-luis-gallardo

Link to Meta Pets Coloring Book

For more information and to join the movement, visit World Happiness Foundation.

#WorldHappinessFest #Happytalism #GlobalHappiness #WellBeing #Sustainability #ConsciousLiving #WorldHappinessFoundation #FreedomAndHappiness #GlobalWellBeing

Go Deeper into Happytalism.

Read the Book Brands & Rousers. The Holistic System to Foster High-Performing Businesses, Brands and Careers.

https://a.co/d/0bZcyBZ

Explore how to make your Organization an #EnterpriseofHappiness.

Chief Well-Being Officer Program. https://www.worldhappiness.academy/courses/Chief-Mental-and-Physical-Wellbeing-Officer

Certified Professional Coach. Specialized in Happiness & Well-Being: https://www.worldhappiness.academy/courses/Professional-Coaching-Specialization-in-Happiness-and-Well-Being

Explore how to make your schools a #SchoolofHappiness.

https://worldhappinessacademy2.com/Schoolsofhappinesshome

Explore how to make your city a #CityofHappiness. https://www.teohlab.com/city-of-happiness

Gross Global Happiness Summit. https://centre.upeace.org/ggh-2025/

World Happiness Fest. https://worldhappiness.foundation/fest/world-happiness-week/

Apply for a Scholarship to the Chief Well-Being Officer Program. https://forms.gle/6PfnFAUQJ39RC4Rv7

#Happytalism #Happytalismo #Happiness #WorldHappiness #WorldHappinessFest #WorldHappinessAcademy #WorldHappinessPress #CWO #ChiefWellBeingOfficer #CoachingforHappiness #GNH #GGH #Leadership #Education #MentalHealth #Health #Hope #Forgiveness #Compassion #Love #Kindness #Consciousness #Freedom #Jaipur #India

UPEACE Centre for Executive Education University for Peace (UPEACE) – UN Mandated Florida International University Florida International University – College of Business Dr. Rekhi Singh REKHI FOUNDATION FOR HAPPINESS Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Saamdu Chetri Dr. Sungu Armagan Dr. Edith Shiro Vibha Tara Ellen Campos Sousa, Ph.D. Jayati Sinha Valerie Freilich Mavis Tsai Mohit Mukherjee Rosalinda Ballesteros Raj Raghunathan Philip Kotler Nichol Bradford Daniel Almagor Raúl Varela Barros World Happiness Fest – bēCREATION Fundación Mundial de la Felicidad (España) Luis Gallardo Aneel Chima Manas Kumar Mandal Jennifer Price Paul Atkins Yogesh Kochhar Loretta Breuning, PhD Tia Kansara Ph.D. Hon FRIBA Deepak Ohri Nancy Richmond Rolando Gadala-Maria Carine Bouery Liliana Nuñez Ugalde LANU Silvia Parra R

#DeepReflection #ConnectionToLife #EmotionalHealing #CompassionateInquiry #GratitudeJourney #TouchVsFeel #TraumaHealing #IntegratingShadows #EmpoweringGifts #SubconsciousHealing #ManifestationPower #Wholeness #HealingTrauma #InnerJourney #EmbracingVulnerability #HumanConnection #PathToFlourishing #NewHumanity #CompassionateLiving #SelfAwareness #SelfEmpowerment #HealingThroughGratitude #TransformingSuffering #ShadowWork #EmotionalIntegration #LightAndShadow #HealingJourney #FeelingAlive #TruthAndHealing #WholenessAndHealing #ConsciousLiving #SpiritualGrowth #MindfulLiving #HealingThroughCompassion #SelfDiscovery #InnerPeace #LivingFully #EmbraceTheJourney #FindingGratitude #HealingThroughHypnotherapy #HumanFlourishing